There's a lot about Logic I could complain about, but at the end of the day, who cares? The Logic community certainly doesn't. I stopped using Logic a few months ago (S1 and Reaper meet all my needs) but I didn't go to the Logic forums to announce it. I just fail to understand the need to take "a parting shot" on the way out. Modern daw users are rather transient (no audio pun intended) in general.Īgreed and I get it. Same thing happened when Studio One 3 released. Reaper 5, Cubase 8, Logic X, Bitwig, whatever. On every major daw release somebody says that. Graytermedia wrote Lawrence wroteI wouldn't read too much into it. I'd also warn the OP that in my experience, the longer you use a particular DAW, the longer the list of gripes (feature requests) about it grow as you ask yourself questions like "why isn't this simple feature from X DAW implemented in my current DAW, I didn't even notice that at first." It's all about finding a DAW that does most of what you want well, and maybe keeping another DAW or two (and/or a notation editor) around in case you need a particular feature. If we're going to have threads like this at all, I just wish posters would focus more on "how to improve Studio One" versus the "I found a better DAW haha" tone that these posts all too often have. That said, Studio One lets me work more intuitively and efficiently. For instance, yeah, Reaper's startup time and CPU efficiency are HUGE advantages over S1. These posts are always kind of obnoxious in that they're completely unnecessary (if you like Reaper better, fine), but there is some useful information to be gleaned from comparing strengths and weaknesses of one DAW to another.
0 kommentar(er)
